Building a mobile app isn’t only about coding. It is the entire process, automations and testing, code architecture and of course people behind all of that. I was writing about all of this in my latest blog post Fail safe, not fast.
Today you can also see the video from my presentation at Mobiconf 2018.
I was talking about our experiences from building mobile apps at Azimo. So if you are curious about how the relatively small team can build effectively an app for the global market, I invite you to watch this:
I also had a chance to share my insight during this year’s Google DevFest in Coimbra, Portugal. Slides from the updated presentation can be found on my SpeakerDeck.
I hope you’ll enjoy it. 🍿📺
Soon I’ll publish more posts about doing effective mobile engineering. Stay in touch!
Breaking the monolith to microservices is a well-known concept to make backend solutions extendable and maintainable in a scale, by bigger teams. Since mobile apps have become more complex, very often developed by teams of tens of software engineers this concept also grows in mobile platforms. There are many benefits from having apps split into modules/features/libraries:
features can be developed independently
project structure is cleaner
building process can be way faster (e.g., running unit tests on a module can be a matter of seconds, instead of minutes for the entire project)
In case you are struggling with multi-module Android project, I have created example app showing how to deal with things like:
Dependency injection with Dagger 2
Jacoco tests coverage report
Even if those are very basic things, it can take some time to make them working correctly in multi-module Android app. To have working solutions in one place, I have created example project on my Github account. There will be more over the time (proguard, instrumentation testing, instant apps). But even at this stage it is also worth sharing.
A couple months ago, during MCE³ conference, Gregory Kick in his presentationshowed a new concept of providing Subcomponents (e.g. to Activities). New approach should give us a way to create ActivitySubcomponent without having AppComponent object reference (which used to be a factory for Activities Subcomponents).
To make it real we had to wait for a new release of Dagger: version 2.7.
In Azimo Android app we use Dagger 2 as a framework for Dependency Injection to make our code architecture clean and easy to scale. Like in our previous post we would like to share our experience so today I’ll show how to avoid issues and build custom UserScope which can be used in production app.
Custom scopes in Dagger 2 can give better control on dependencies which should live unusual amount of time (different than application and screen lifetime). But to implement it properly in Android app we need to keep in mind things like: scope cannot live longer than application process, process can be killed by system and restored in the middle of user flow with new objects instances.
Dagger 2 — fully static, compile-time dependency injection framework is a backbone of code architecture in Azimo Android app. We already know that with growing dev team clean code structure is one of the most important things in every project. Initialisation/usage separation, easier testing (unit or functional), better scalability —those are just a few of the benefits that come from use of dependency injection framework like Dagger 2.
This post is a part of series of posts showing Dependency Injection with Dagger 2 framework in Android. Today we’re going to take a look at Dagger Producers — an extension to Dagger 2 that implements asynchronous dependency injection in Java.
#PerfMatters – recently very popular hashtag, especially in the Android world. The times when the apps just did something, no matter how, are already gone. Now everything should be pleasant, smooth and fast. For example Instagram spent almost half a year just to make its app faster, more beautiful, and more screen-size aware.